-99% vs median/mg Too cheap?
PureRawz
Large-catalog vendor (peptides/SARMs/nootropics) accepting crypto/Zelle. Moderate-to-positive Reddit reputation, praised for promos and bulk pricing. Aggregated from public sources; VialGrade does not endorse any vendor.
Get told when a price moves or a lab test changes.
C- — proceed with caution
Worth a closer look before you buy: a public regulatory record, open risk flags in its reputation record, and mixed buyer reports, though it does have 1 independent lab test and high scores from independent trackers.
Why this grade — Something independently documented counts against this vendor — government enforcement. Real lab tests would not cancel that out, so the grade stops here.
Based on 5 checks. 2 backed by a document.
1
Independent lab tests
99.2%
Median tested purity
186
Listings
+41%
Typical price vs market
1
Buyer reviews on file
Read from the certificate, not re-measured by VialGrade. Purity is not a grade. Purity vs grade
The bottom line
Is PureRawz legit?
C- — proceed with caution. What that rests on: 1 independent lab test on record, 1 public regulatory record and buyer reports that read mixed.
Never a safety claim or an endorsement — VialGrade sells nothing and takes no money from vendors. Where we hold no evidence, we say so instead of hiding it.
Which checks did we run, and what did each one find?
Each check comes from something you can read further down — a good result and a bad one both stay visible. Marked Confirmed (we hold the document), Reported (a source we cite), or Our guess.
Government records
ConfirmedNamed in 1 public regulatory record (e.g. an FDA warning letter).
Independent lab tests
Confirmed1 independent lab test on record · median 99.2%.
Scam reports
Reported1 enforcement record · FDA warning letter
What other trackers say
Reportedpeptigrity-community 4/5 (their opinion, not ours).
What buyers say
ReportedMixed reports from buyers.
Read this first
What is flagged on PureRawz right now?
Enough to change how you read the rest of this page: 1 public government record names it. Each one is a record we can show you, not our opinion — the detail and its source are below.
Regulatory & enforcement record
1 public regulatory record
These are official public records naming PureRawz (or an operator VialGrade matched to it). We report the action and link the source; we do not add an accusation of our own.
FDA · Warning letter · 2025-09-08
FDA warning letter — unapproved tianeptine products
FDA reviewed purerawz.co in August 2025 and found multiple Tianeptine products; despite 'for laboratory and research use only' labeling, FDA deemed them unapproved new drugs intended for human use.
Evidence, check by check
Where does the evidence hold up, and where is it missing?
Of the 6 things we check on a vendor, 3 are backed by evidence we can point at, 2 need a closer look, and 1 we simply don’t know. Each card says which, and where it came from.
Who they are
ConfirmedUnclaimed page — nothing here is written by them. Has this vendor claimed their page? No. Everything here was gathered by us from public sources.
Lab tests current?
Confirmed1 lab test on file · newest tested 2023-08-16. The independent lab tests we hold for this vendor, newest first.
Independently tested?
Confirmed1 independent lab test · typically 99.2% pure. Independent lab tests and published batch test records linked to this vendor.
Track record shipping
We don't knowWe can't see how they ship. They don't sell through us, so we can't see how fast they ship.
What buyers say
Needs a closer lookMixed reports · a fair number of reports · we're fairly sure. Carries a moderately positive community reputation for testing transparency and a deep catalog, but is dragged down by a steady stream of specific non-delivery and support complaints. Not a clear scam, but real quality-control and fulfillment risk.
Scam & red flags
Needs a closer look1 enforcement record · FDA warning letter. Official government actions (FDA, DOJ, FTC) and open fraud cases against this vendor. These are public records, not our opinion.
Each answer stands on its own and says where it came from. Where we don’t have the evidence, it says so — we never invent a number or blend everything into one score.
Independent testing
Has anyone independently tested PureRawz?
Real, publicly verifiable third-party tests. Purity is read from the certificate itself. A test reflects one lab’s result for one submitted batch — not a guarantee that every vial matches.
How does this data get here?
Every record below is a real certificate of analysis, gathered two ways: from the public verification feeds that independent labs (like Janoshik) publish, and from the certificates vendors post on their own product pages. We open each certificate document and read the measured purity, content, batch, and date directly off it — a scraper can’t read a number printed inside an image, so this is done by machine vision, then recorded here with a link back to the original.
Nothing here is typed in by a vendor or invented by us. Where a certificate is missing, we say so rather than filling the gap.
We re-check the lab feed, too. A “still listed” tag means the certificate is currently public in Janoshik’s database — we re-verify against the live feed and stamp the date. If a cert is later pulled, the tag flips. It’s a freshness check on the same source, not a second independent opinion.
What a certificate does & doesn’t prove
Three different questions. Purity (“how clean?”), identity (“is it the right molecule?”, a mass-spec test), and content (“did I get the labeled mg?”) are separate. A vial can be 99% pure and still be the wrong peptide, or the right peptide underdosed. We flag the measured dose against the label above; underdosing is the most common real fraud.
Who submitted the sample matters. Most of these are vendor-submitted — the seller chose which vial to send, so one good certificate doesn’t prove every batch is the same. The gold standard is a blind test, where a buyer sends a vial they bought as a normal customer. Same label doesn’t prove same product; same batch number doesn’t prove same batch.
99.2%
highest tested purity
| Certificate | Manufacturer | Batch | Purity | Content / dose | Lab | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PureRawz | 0086 | 99.18% | — | MZ Biolabs | Verify |
Third-party aggregators
What do other trackers say about PureRawz?
1 independent peptide-testing aggregator has published a rating for PureRawz. These are their opinions, not ours — we show them side by side and link to each source so you can check the basis yourself.
Operational signals
What does PureRawz’s own storefront tell us?
We haven’t read PureRawz’s own site into a record yet.
This section normally carries neutral facts from the vendor's public site and domain records — how old the domain is, which payment rails it takes, whether it posts a research-use-only notice. None of it proves what is in a vial, and right now we hold none of it for this vendor.
What buyers say
What do buyers report about PureRawz?
Mixed reports across a moderate set of reports we could gather from public sources, held at medium confidence.
Carries a moderately positive community reputation for testing transparency and a deep catalog, but is dragged down by a steady stream of specific non-delivery and support complaints. Not a clear scam, but real quality-control and fulfillment risk.
What buyers praise
- Reddit threads (2024-2025) place it among more-trusted US domestic vendors for testing transparency/COAs
- Deep catalog (peptides, SARMs, nootropics, GLP-1); many report fast, properly-labeled shipments
Red flags reported
- PissedConsumer + Trustpilot reports of orders never arriving and fake/never-picked-up tracking numbers
- Specific dosing complaint: LGD-4033 (4033) overdosed and MK-677 (677) underdosed
- Unresponsive customer service on quality inquiries (multi-day delays)
- Scamadviser flags caution; scam-detector medium trust (~58.5). A dedicated hit-piece domain (purerawzreview.com) exists but reads like a competitor SEO attack, discounted
Gathered from public web sources on 8/5/2026 and weighted toward specific, reproducible reports over generic praise — praise is cheap to fake, failure reports and independent lab results are not. Reputation decays: ownership and quality change over time, so re-check against current sources before you buy.
Community
What does r/Peptides say about PureRawz?
No r/Peptides discussion for PureRawz has been captured.
Real vendors usually get talked about. An absence of mentions is a mild signal worth noticing — it is not a clean bill of health, and it is not proof the vendor is new or fake either.
Regulators
Has any regulator taken action against PureRawz?
Yes — 1 public record names PureRawz, or an operator we matched to it.
Each agency, action type, outcome and a link to the original document is at the top of this page. We report the action and link the source; we do not add an accusation of our own.
Who owns it
Who’s really behind PureRawz?
We found no hard identifier tying PureRawz to any other storefront we track.
Not linked to any other store we track
We checked PureRawz against every other store we track for the tell-tale signs that two “different” shops are the same people: the same tracking code, the same product photo, the same tested batch, the same supplier. We found none. That doesn’t make them trustworthy — it just means they aren’t one of a group of fake “rival” stores we’ve spotted.
Catalog
What does PureRawz sell, and at what price?
186 listings we have read from their store, cheapest per milligram first, priced 41% above the market median across 109 comparable listings. A price is not evidence of quality either way.
$143
$0.0052/mg
-94% vs median/mg Too cheap?
$154
$0.006/mg
-100% vs median/mg Too cheap?
$32
$0.0064/mg
-87% vs median/mg Too cheap?
-85% vs median/mg Too cheap?
-75% vs median/mg Too cheap?
$211
$0.01/mg
-100% vs median/mg Too cheap?
$347
$0.03/mg
-98% vs median/mg Too cheap?
-17% vs median/mg
Showing 9 of 186, cheapest per mg first






