The testing laboratories
Who actually runs the tests.
Every certificate names a lab. Here is what we could verify about each one — whether it’s a real, independent third-party lab, whether it holds accreditation (and whether that accreditation even covers peptides), and how much evidence flows through it. We only call a lab “independent” when we’ve confirmed it. Everything is sourced; naming a lab is never an endorsement.
Kovera Labs
United States (Illinois, claimed)
Kovera operates a real public COA verifier (~1,816 certificates), but its independence is contested: community reports allege registration/IP overlap with a vendor client and question its ~6-month-old domain, mailbox address, and lack of accreditation. These are unverified allegations — we neither vouch for nor accuse; we simply do not count it as confirmed independent evidence.
Certificates here
6
Vendors here
2
Accreditation
No accreditation on record
SR Bio Labs
United States (Orlando, FL)
SR Biolabs LLC is a real Florida company, but we found no affirmative evidence establishing its independence from the vendors it serves, and the 'MD' credential on its COA signatures could not be verified in state records. Shown, not vouched-for.
Certificates here
2
Vendors here
1
Accreditation
No accreditation on record
Accreditation is not a rubber stamp.
ISO/IEC 17025 is method- and scope-specific: a lab can be genuinely accredited for food microbiology or heavy metals and still run its peptide purity tests outside that accredited scope. Where that’s the case, we say so. Most peptide-market labs hold no accreditation at all and operate as harm-reduction services — useful, but not regulatory-grade QC. We report what each lab can and can’t back, and we never repeat a vendor’s accreditation claim as fact.